Military Forms Guide

DA Form 7413 — EXCEPTIONAL FAMILY MEMBER PROGRAM (EFMP) ASSIGNMENT COORDINATION SHEET

exceptional family member program (efmp) assignment coordination sheet

A newer edition of this form has been issued (02/01/2026). Download the current edition.

Every entry on DA Form 7413 exists because a record system needs it in writing. The form's official title is EXCEPTIONAL FAMILY MEMBER PROGRAM (EFMP) ASSIGNMENT COORDINATION SHEET, and it is raised whenever an office must exceptional family member program (efmp) assignment coordination sheet in a way that survives the departure of everyone involved. Memory does not transfer between assignments; a filed document does. The edition dated 02/01/2026, status ACTIVE, is what stands here, spread across 1 page(s) and about 129 fields — a count that reflects how much detail the receiving system requires, not how much the drafter wishes to give. A later edition has since been published, which is why this one remains: records executed against it must still be readable in the terms they were written.

Two offices stand behind the form, and the distinction between them explains most of what follows. TSG is the proponent: it decides what the form asks and revises it when the underlying process changes. AR 608-75 is the prescribing authority: it decides when the form is raised at all and where the completed document travels. Content and occasion are separated deliberately, so that a change in procedure does not require redesigning the page.

Retrieval governs the order of entry. The head of the form takes name, identification number, unit and date, and those values become the handles by which the record is found later — the substantive blocks are never searched on. This is why the spelling must match official records exactly rather than approximately.

The rules of entry all trace back to the page being fixed in advance. Tabbing follows the order built into the form, which usually matches how the page reads and misses less than clicking. An exclusive group discards the earlier selection because contradictory entries would make the record unusable. One-line fields have no wrap because print positions are predetermined, so an overlong entry displays fully and prints truncated. Longer text goes to the remarks area or a continuation, both provided for exactly that. Where nothing applies, the nil mark is entered — a blank leaves the reader unable to tell a considered answer from a skipped one.

A signature is what converts entries into a record, which is why it comes last and why an unsigned form remains a draft however complete it looks. Where a reviewing official, an approving authority or a witness also signs, each adds a distinct attestation, and each dates the day of signing rather than the day of preparation — the dates trace the sequence of responsibility. The recurring defects are worth knowing precisely because they defeat that purpose: an empty mandatory field leaves an obligation unmet, transposed identification digits attach the record to nobody, a date with day and month reversed puts events in the wrong order, and entries left in a reused working copy assert facts nobody intended.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

Why several files for one page? Because the form has to be completed in a headquarters and in places without a workstation, and PDF, XFDL covers both. The fillable pdf holds interactive fields that fix each entry in place and remove handwriting from the equation. The printable pdf is the same layout without those fields, meant for a printer and a pen. Neither is a lesser copy of the other; each answers a condition the other cannot.

The choice of application decides whether your work survives. Browsers render pdfs as documents to be read; where a viewer shows fields without a mechanism to store them, typed text disappears when the tab closes, and nothing announces the loss. A full reader treats the file as a form and preserves entries on save. The xfdl format comes from IBM Lotus Forms, used across Army systems because of the routing and signature functions built into it, and it opens in the Lotus Forms Viewer alone.

There is no charge and no sign-up. Published documents are distributed as published, without modification.

What the form asks for

  • ASSIGN
  • ContentArea1
  • DATE
  • DIAGA
  • DIAGB
  • DIAGC
  • DIAGD
  • DSN
  • EMAIL
  • EXPA
  • EXPB
  • EXPC
  • EXPD
  • FAX
  • MBRA
  • MBRB
  • MBRC
  • MBRD
  • NAMEA
  • NAMEB
  • NAMEC
  • NOA
  • NOB
  • NOC

The routing in AR 608-75 decides where the document goes — a named office, the administrative channel, or the individual's file — and the records schedule for the series decides how long it stays. Neither is a local judgement, because a record system loses its meaning if each office keeps things for its own preferred interval. Copy the form before submitting it.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

Revision follows the process, which is why editions appear without a fixed interval, and the printed date rather than any version number identifies them. Nothing on a stored copy signals that it has aged; the check is manual. Work already completed under a superseded edition stands as filed, because the record was made under those terms and is properly interpreted under them.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to TSG or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 7413?
EXCEPTIONAL FAMILY MEMBER PROGRAM (EFMP) ASSIGNMENT COORDINATION SHEET
Which edition is current?
02/01/2026
Who is responsible for this form?
TSG
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Other forms in the series