Military Forms Guide

DA Form 7246 — EXCEPTIONAL FAMILY MEMBER PROGRAM (EFMP) SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE

exceptional family member program (efmp) screening questionnaire

A newer edition of this form has been issued (02/01/2026). Download the current edition.

The reason DA Form 7246 looks the way it does is that a file has to speak for itself. Officially EXCEPTIONAL FAMILY MEMBER PROGRAM (EFMP) SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE, it serves to exceptional family member program (efmp) screening questionnaire, and the record it produces outlasts the people and the circumstances behind it. Edition 02/01/2026, status ACTIVE, is the version published here: 2 page(s), close to 200 fields, each one present because some later reader will need that fact without being able to ask for it. Because a subsequent edition has appeared, this copy stays available — a record made under one edition is interpreted under that edition.

Behind any Army form sit two separate decisions. What the document asks is settled by TSG, which maintains and revises it. Whether you raise it, and where it goes once signed, is settled by AR 608-75. That division is the reason a form can outlive several changes in the process it serves.

Identification precedes substance for a structural reason. Name, identification number, organisation and date of preparation are how the finished document is located in a file or a database; the body of the form is what someone reads after the search has succeeded. Spell the name as official records spell it, since the search runs against those records and not against habit.

Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.

The signature is the point at which entries become an assertion someone stands behind, so it follows everything else and its absence leaves a draft. Countersignatures by reviewing, approving or witnessing officials each carry their own weight and are dated at signing, which is how the file preserves the order of responsibility. Seen that way, the familiar errors are not clerical trivia: an unanswered mandatory field, digits transposed in an identification number, day and month reversed, and residue from a reused file each put something false or unresolved into a document that will be relied upon.

Behind the Privacy Act statement is a requirement that anyone asked for personal data be told, in advance, under what authority it is sought, for what purpose, who else routinely sees it, and whether refusal is possible. Reading it after completing the fields defeats its function. And the completed form is itself a personal record from that point on, subject to the handling rules such records carry.

Download the form

The published formats — PDF, XFDL — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • BRANCH
  • COND_SERV
  • COND_SERV_1
  • COND_SERV_2
  • COND_SERV_3
  • COND_SERV_4
  • ContentArea1
  • DATE
  • DATE_A
  • DATE_B
  • DOB
  • DOB_1
  • DOB_2
  • DOB_3
  • DOB_4
  • DSN
  • DUTYADD
  • DUTYPHONE
  • EDUC_N_A
  • EDUC_N_B
  • EDUC_N_C
  • EDUC_N_D
  • EDUC_N_E
  • EDUC_Y_A

Where the signed form goes is settled by AR 608-75 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

Revision follows the process, which is why editions appear without a fixed interval, and the printed date rather than any version number identifies them. Nothing on a stored copy signals that it has aged; the check is manual. Work already completed under a superseded edition stands as filed, because the record was made under those terms and is properly interpreted under them.

One boundary should be stated clearly. What is distributed here are copies of published Department of the Army forms; the site is independent, issues nothing of its own, and holds no position in the system it describes. Proponency, prescribing directives and retention schedules operate without reference to it. Consequently nothing here is legal advice and no assurance about acceptance is possible. Questions about a particular entry, a requirement or eligibility belong with TSG or your servicing administrative office.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 7246?
EXCEPTIONAL FAMILY MEMBER PROGRAM (EFMP) SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE
Which edition is current?
02/01/2026
Who is responsible for this form?
TSG
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Other forms in the series