Military Forms Guide

DD Form 2060 — DD Form 2060, FMS Obligational Authority, March 1979

Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Obligational Authority

Consider what a Department-level form is for. DD Form 2060 — DD Form 2060, FMS Obligational Authority, March 1979 — was established to Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Obligational Authority, and it was placed in the DD sequence because the underlying transaction occurs throughout the Defense establishment in substantially the same shape. Standardizing the record was cheaper and more reliable than letting six services each design their own.

That decision has consequences you will notice. Because not stated prescribes the form for the Department as a whole, and not stated maintains it on the Department's behalf, the same blank passes between the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marine Corps, the Space Force, the Coast Guard when operating under Defense jurisdiction, the defense agencies and the combatant commands without translation. A clerk in one component reads a record created in another and finds the fields where they expect them.

Current edition: not stated, status not stated. Understand why that date is worth attention here. When the Department reissues a form, the replacement takes effect across every component simultaneously, so an older copy is not merely locally out of date — it is out of date in every office that might receive it.

The form is laid out top to bottom in a sequence that reflects how the record will be read, not merely how it was drawn. Identification comes first because everything below it is understood in relation to a named person, unit or transaction; substantive entries follow; certification closes the document because certification attests to what precedes it. Filling out of order tends to produce internal inconsistencies — an entry that made sense before the header was settled and does not afterward.

Before the first entry, compare the date printed on the form face with not stated. This is not bureaucratic fussiness. Editions change field numbering, and a receiving office working from the current layout may look for information where your copy does not put it. On a Department form the exposure is wider than usual: your record may be reviewed by an office in another service entirely, one with no reason to remember what the previous edition looked like.

Every field takes an entry, N/A included. The reason is evidentiary rather than clerical: a completed record is supposed to show what was asked and what was answered, and blank space records neither. On dates, follow the format printed beside the field. Conventions vary between components, and a joint document is read by people who do not share your habits.

Where the form collects personal identifiers, a Privacy Act Statement accompanies it, and its placement is meaningful. The statute requires disclosure at the point of collection — authority, purpose, routine uses, and the consequence of declining — so that the person supplying the information does so knowing what becomes of it. Reading it after you have filled the fields inverts the arrangement entirely.

Signature is the point at which a completed form becomes a certification, and the requirement follows from that. On paper it means ink in the designated block; electronically it means a credentialed digital signature, ordinarily applied with a Common Access Card in software that supports it. A name typed into the signature field is data, not an act — it demonstrates nothing about who entered it. The date beside the signature fixes when the certification was made, which is why a signed but undated block is treated as incomplete.

Every item on the standing defect list undermines the record in the same way — it leaves a question the file cannot answer later. Obsolete edition, empty mandatory boxes, illegible scanned handwriting, non-conforming dates, missing signature or date. Unclear entries are resolved from the printed instructions first and from not stated where the two texts diverge.

Download the form

The set published here is PDF, covering 1 pages with roughly 123 fields. More than one format survives because the Department serves users under very different conditions, from a desk with current software to a location where a printer is the only reliable output.

Two states of the same page circulate, and the reason is worth knowing. In the fillable pdf, the boxes are real fields holding real data; in the printable pdf, the boxes are drawings. Where a record will cross components — as Department records regularly do — the typed version is the safer artifact. Each scan, each forwarding, each reproduction costs handwriting a little legibility, and the office that finally files the record is rarely the office that received it first.

If you find an xfdl file here, its presence is historical. The format belongs to IBM Lotus Forms, which the Department adopted Department-wide for electronic forms and fielded on a scale that makes wholesale removal slow. You need the matching viewer to open it; ordinary pdf software cannot read the format and will say so unhelpfully.

Nothing here is charged for. Published Defense forms are public documents and distribution carries no fee, in any format. One caution about software: fill the form in a desktop pdf application rather than a browser tab. Browser-embedded viewers implement field behaviour inconsistently, and the failure mode is silent loss of everything you entered.

What the form asks for

  • Press this Reset button to clear the data from all fields.
  • F M S Case Commitment/Obligation Authority. (3).Enter F M S Planning Directive Control Number. 1st entry.
  • (4). Enter Total Case Value. 1st entry.
  • (5). Enter Amount To Be Held in Trust Fund. 1st entry.
  • (6). Enter Net Case Value. 1st entry.
  • Prior Period Reimbursable, Funding/Direct Cite Authority. (7). Enter Amount Received. 1st entry.
  • (8). Enter Amount Required. 1st entry.
  • (9). Enter Amount Withdrawn. 1st entry.
  • Authority Required This Fiscal Year. (10). Enter Amount Reimbursable. 1st entry.
  • (11). Direct Cite. 1st entry. Enter Amount.
  • (12). Remaining Program Value. 1st entry. Amount is automatically entered in this field.
  • F M S Case Commitment/Obligation Authority. (3). F M S Planning Directive Control Number. 2nd entry.
  • F M S Case Commitment/Obligation Authority. (3). F M S Planning Directive Control Number. 3rd entry.
  • (4). Enter Total Case Value. 2nd entry.
  • (5). Enter Amount To Be Held in Trust Fund. 2nd entry.
  • (6). Enter Net Case Value. 2nd entry.
  • Prior Period Reimbursable, Funding/Direct Cite Authority. (7). Enter Amount Received. 2st entry.
  • (8). Enter Amount Required. 2nd entry.
  • (9). Enter Amount Withdrawn. 2nd entry.
  • Authority Required This Fiscal Year. (10). Enter Amount Reimbursable. 2nd entry.
  • (11). Direct Cite. 2nd entry. Enter Amount.
  • (12). Remaining Program Value. 2nd entry. Amount is automatically entered in this field.
  • (4). Enter Total Case Value. 3rd entry.
  • (5). Enter Amount To Be Held in Trust Fund. 3rd entry.

Route the executed form as not stated or local guidance directs, and retain a duplicate first. Cross-component routing is ordinary for DD forms, which is precisely why a personal copy earns its keep: the receiving office may belong to an organization you have no standing to query about a missing document.

Forms referenced inside this one are located by number alone, and that simplicity is a direct product of Department-level numbering. Because the DD sequence is maintained centrally and not duplicated by service, a number is a complete address: one number, one document, throughout the Defense establishment.

Procedures that touch both Department and service processes will cite forms from both sequences, and the coincidence of numbers between them is exactly that — coincidence. An Army proponent maintains the DA series for the Army; not stated or another Department office maintains the DD series for the whole Department. Two independent registries, two independent numbering runs, no correspondence at any value.

A form is downstream of the policy that requires it, and revision usually starts there: a directive is reissued, a collection requirement is altered, notice language is updated by statute. The form is republished as a consequence. Since none of that reaches individual users, an archived copy quietly becomes wrong, and verifying not stated each time you download is the whole remedy.

What you have here is the document and a description of it, which is a different thing from guidance. This page is not an organ of the Department, gives no legal or procedural advice, and makes no representation about the outcome of any filing; the offices that administer the requirement are the only ones positioned to answer that. Applicability, eligibility and procedural questions belong to not stated, to your servicing personnel office, or to the office designated in not stated.

Questions and answers

What is DD Form 2060?
DD Form 2060, FMS Obligational Authority, March 1979
Which edition is current?
Not stated by the publisher
Who is responsible for this form?
Not stated
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF

Other forms in the series