Military Forms Guide

DA Form 7799 — REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT

request for approval of information management requirement

A newer edition of this form has been issued (02/01/2019). Download the current edition.

The reason DA Form 7799 looks the way it does is that a file has to speak for itself. Officially REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT, it serves to request for approval of information management requirement, and the record it produces outlasts the people and the circumstances behind it. Edition 02/01/2019, status ACTIVE, is the version published here: 1 page(s), close to 118 fields, each one present because some later reader will need that fact without being able to ask for it. Because a subsequent edition has appeared, this copy stays available — a record made under one edition is interpreted under that edition.

Two offices stand behind the form, and the distinction between them explains most of what follows. CIO is the proponent: it decides what the form asks and revises it when the underlying process changes. AR 25-98 is the prescribing authority: it decides when the form is raised at all and where the completed document travels. Content and occasion are separated deliberately, so that a change in procedure does not require redesigning the page.

Retrieval governs the order of entry. The head of the form takes name, identification number, unit and date, and those values become the handles by which the record is found later — the substantive blocks are never searched on. This is why the spelling must match official records exactly rather than approximately.

Tab order is not a convenience feature; it was fixed when the form was built and generally traces the page, so following it produces the sequence the designer intended and leaves fewer gaps than a mouse. Exclusive option groups clear the previous selection because the record is not permitted to hold two contradictory answers. Single-line fields do not wrap for the same reason the layout is fixed: the printed page has to fall in known positions, so text past the field width is cut at the margin even though the screen still shows it whole. Overflow belongs in remarks or on a continuation, where there is room designed for it. And an inapplicable field is marked rather than skipped, since a blank tells a later reader nothing about whether the question was considered.

Signing is the act that makes the document evidence, and until it happens the entries are only a proposal. Additional signatures — reviewer, approver, witness — each stand for a separate judgement, dated when applied so the record shows who accepted what and in what order. The common faults all damage that record in the same way: a blank mandatory field breaks the chain of required answers, swapped digits in an identification number detach the document from its subject, an inverted day and month misplaces it in time, and stale data from a reused copy states things nobody meant to state.

Behind the Privacy Act statement is a requirement that anyone asked for personal data be told, in advance, under what authority it is sought, for what purpose, who else routinely sees it, and whether refusal is possible. Reading it after completing the fields defeats its function. And the completed form is itself a personal record from that point on, subject to the handling rules such records carry.

Download the form

Formats exist because completion happens under different conditions, not because anyone wanted variety. The published set is PDF. A fillable pdf carries live entry objects, so typed text lands in fixed positions and stays legible whoever reads it later. A printable pdf drops those objects and leaves the page as an image, which is what an office needs where a screen is unavailable and a pen is not. The document itself is unchanged between them; what differs is the circumstance each anticipates.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter.

There is no charge and no sign-up. Published documents are distributed as published, without modification.

What the form asks for

  • ASSIGNEDRCS1
  • Concur1
  • Concur2
  • ContentArea1
  • DATEAPPROVED1
  • DATEOFREQUEST
  • DateOfficialSigned
  • Email1
  • Email2
  • ExistingRCSNumber1
  • Form1
  • FormNumberNoTitle1
  • FrequencyOfRequirement1
  • GRADERANK1
  • Justification1
  • Line1
  • Line2
  • Line3
  • Line4
  • Line5
  • Line6
  • Line7
  • Line8
  • Line9

Disposition is prescribed, not chosen. AR 25-98 names the destination, whether that is a specific office, the unit administrative channel or the personal record, and the applicable records schedule governs how long it survives there. Both rules exist to keep the file consistent across offices with different habits. Take your copy before the document leaves, since it will not come back.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

Editions change because the process changes, and the printed edition date is the only marker of which version a page belongs to. A copy saved locally cannot know it has been superseded, so the date on it is compared against the edition in force before reuse. Records already executed under an earlier edition are left alone — a document is read under the terms it was made, and reopening completed files to match a later form would falsify the account.

It is worth being plain about what this page is within all of the above. The files are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, offered for download by a site with no official standing and no part in issuing anything. That matters because the machinery described here — proponency, prescribing directives, records schedules — runs entirely elsewhere. Nothing written here is legal advice, and no statement can be made about whether an office will accept a given document. CIO and the administrative office servicing your unit answer questions of entry, requirement and eligibility, and they are the ones positioned to.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 7799?
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT
Which edition is current?
02/01/2019
Who is responsible for this form?
CIO
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, PDF

Other forms in the series