Military Forms Guide

DA Form 7599 — DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY POLICE OFFICER (S&I, ENLISTED PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT DIRECTORATE, U.S. ARMY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMAND, ATTN: AHRC-EPB-M (ASI V5 ASSIGNMENT MANAGER) 2461 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22331-0450)

department of the army police officer (s&i, enlisted personnel management directorate, u.s. army human resources command, attn: ahrc-epb-m (asi v5 assignment manager) 2461 eisenhower avenue, alexandria, va 22331-0450)

Every entry on DA Form 7599 exists because a record system needs it in writing. The form's official title is DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY POLICE OFFICER (S&I, ENLISTED PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT DIRECTORATE, U.S. ARMY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMAND, ATTN: AHRC-EPB-M (ASI V5 ASSIGNMENT MANAGER) 2461 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22331-0450), and it is raised whenever an office must department of the army police officer (s&i, enlisted personnel management directorate, u.s. army human resources command, attn: ahrc-epb-m (asi v5 assignment manager) 2461 eisenhower avenue, alexandria, va 22331-0450) in a way that survives the departure of everyone involved. Memory does not transfer between assignments; a filed document does. The edition dated 09/01/2006, status ACTIVE, is what stands here, spread across unknown page(s) and about unknown fields — a count that reflects how much detail the receiving system requires, not how much the drafter wishes to give.

Two offices stand behind the form, and the distinction between them explains most of what follows. PMG is the proponent: it decides what the form asks and revises it when the underlying process changes. AR 190-56 is the prescribing authority: it decides when the form is raised at all and where the completed document travels. Content and occasion are separated deliberately, so that a change in procedure does not require redesigning the page.

Retrieval governs the order of entry. The head of the form takes name, identification number, unit and date, and those values become the handles by which the record is found later — the substantive blocks are never searched on. This is why the spelling must match official records exactly rather than approximately.

The rules of entry all trace back to the page being fixed in advance. Tabbing follows the order built into the form, which usually matches how the page reads and misses less than clicking. An exclusive group discards the earlier selection because contradictory entries would make the record unusable. One-line fields have no wrap because print positions are predetermined, so an overlong entry displays fully and prints truncated. Longer text goes to the remarks area or a continuation, both provided for exactly that. Where nothing applies, the nil mark is entered — a blank leaves the reader unable to tell a considered answer from a skipped one.

A signature is what converts entries into a record, which is why it comes last and why an unsigned form remains a draft however complete it looks. Where a reviewing official, an approving authority or a witness also signs, each adds a distinct attestation, and each dates the day of signing rather than the day of preparation — the dates trace the sequence of responsibility. The recurring defects are worth knowing precisely because they defeat that purpose: an empty mandatory field leaves an obligation unmet, transposed identification digits attach the record to nobody, a date with day and month reversed puts events in the wrong order, and entries left in a reused working copy assert facts nobody intended.

Behind the Privacy Act statement is a requirement that anyone asked for personal data be told, in advance, under what authority it is sought, for what purpose, who else routinely sees it, and whether refusal is possible. Reading it after completing the fields defeats its function. And the completed form is itself a personal record from that point on, subject to the handling rules such records carry.

Download the form

    The published formats — none published here — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

    The choice of application decides whether your work survives. Browsers render pdfs as documents to be read; where a viewer shows fields without a mechanism to store them, typed text disappears when the tab closes, and nothing announces the loss. A full reader treats the file as a form and preserves entries on save.

    There is no charge and no sign-up. Published documents are distributed as published, without modification.

    The routing in AR 190-56 decides where the document goes — a named office, the administrative channel, or the individual's file — and the records schedule for the series decides how long it stays. Neither is a local judgement, because a record system loses its meaning if each office keeps things for its own preferred interval. Copy the form before submitting it.

    Forms cluster by series and number for the same reason files do: shared proponency and a shared prescribing directive usually mean a shared process. So a document in the DA series referenced on the face of another is generally part of the same transaction, and continuation sheets, cover sheets and transmittals belong to the package from the outset rather than arriving after a query.

    Editions change because the process changes, and the printed edition date is the only marker of which version a page belongs to. A copy saved locally cannot know it has been superseded, so the date on it is compared against the edition in force before reuse. Records already executed under an earlier edition are left alone — a document is read under the terms it was made, and reopening completed files to match a later form would falsify the account.

    It is worth being plain about what this page is within all of the above. The files are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, offered for download by a site with no official standing and no part in issuing anything. That matters because the machinery described here — proponency, prescribing directives, records schedules — runs entirely elsewhere. Nothing written here is legal advice, and no statement can be made about whether an office will accept a given document. PMG and the administrative office servicing your unit answer questions of entry, requirement and eligibility, and they are the ones positioned to.

    Questions and answers

    What is DA Form 7599?
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY POLICE OFFICER (S&I, ENLISTED PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT DIRECTORATE, U.S. ARMY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMAND, ATTN: AHRC-EPB-M (ASI V5 ASSIGNMENT MANAGER) 2461 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22331-0450)
    Which edition is current?
    09/01/2006
    Who is responsible for this form?
    PMG
    In which formats can it be downloaded?
    No file published here

    Other forms in the series