Military Forms Guide

DA Form 7595-4-16 — PERFORM AN EXAMINATION OF THE ELBOW

perform an examination of the elbow

Every entry on DA Form 7595-4-16 exists because a record system needs it in writing. The form's official title is PERFORM AN EXAMINATION OF THE ELBOW, and it is raised whenever an office must perform an examination of the elbow in a way that survives the departure of everyone involved. Memory does not transfer between assignments; a filed document does. The edition dated May 2014, status not stated, is what stands here, spread across 1 page(s) and about 133 fields — a count that reflects how much detail the receiving system requires, not how much the drafter wishes to give.

Behind any Army form sit two separate decisions. What the document asks is settled by TRADOC, which maintains and revises it. Whether you raise it, and where it goes once signed, is settled by TC 8-800. That division is the reason a form can outlive several changes in the process it serves.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

Tab order is not a convenience feature; it was fixed when the form was built and generally traces the page, so following it produces the sequence the designer intended and leaves fewer gaps than a mouse. Exclusive option groups clear the previous selection because the record is not permitted to hold two contradictory answers. Single-line fields do not wrap for the same reason the layout is fixed: the printed page has to fall in known positions, so text past the field width is cut at the margin even though the screen still shows it whole. Overflow belongs in remarks or on a continuation, where there is room designed for it. And an inapplicable field is marked rather than skipped, since a blank tells a later reader nothing about whether the question was considered.

A signature is what converts entries into a record, which is why it comes last and why an unsigned form remains a draft however complete it looks. Where a reviewing official, an approving authority or a witness also signs, each adds a distinct attestation, and each dates the day of signing rather than the day of preparation — the dates trace the sequence of responsibility. The recurring defects are worth knowing precisely because they defeat that purpose: an empty mandatory field leaves an obligation unmet, transposed identification digits attach the record to nobody, a date with day and month reversed puts events in the wrong order, and entries left in a reused working copy assert facts nobody intended.

Behind the Privacy Act statement is a requirement that anyone asked for personal data be told, in advance, under what authority it is sought, for what purpose, who else routinely sees it, and whether refusal is possible. Reading it after completing the fields defeats its function. And the completed form is itself a personal record from that point on, subject to the handling rules such records carry.

Download the form

Formats exist because completion happens under different conditions, not because anyone wanted variety. The published set is PDF. A fillable pdf carries live entry objects, so typed text lands in fixed positions and stays legible whoever reads it later. A printable pdf drops those objects and leaves the page as an image, which is what an office needs where a screen is unavailable and a pen is not. The document itself is unchanged between them; what differs is the circumstance each anticipates.

Software determines whether an entry lasts. A browser viewer is designed for reading, and several will take typed input into fields without any means of writing it back — the text is simply absent when you reopen. A standalone reader handles the form structure properly.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • ContentArea1
  • Date1
  • Eval_Comments
  • Fail1_a
  • Fail1_b
  • Fail1_c
  • Fail2_a
  • Fail2_b
  • Fail2_c
  • Fail3_a
  • Fail3_b
  • Fail3_c
  • Fail4_a
  • Fail4_b
  • Fail4_c
  • Fail5_a
  • Fail5_b
  • Fail5_c
  • FinalEval
  • InitialEval
  • Page1
  • PageArea1
  • Pass1_a
  • Pass1_b

Where the signed form goes is settled by TC 8-800 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

Revision follows the process, which is why editions appear without a fixed interval, and the printed date rather than any version number identifies them. Nothing on a stored copy signals that it has aged; the check is manual. Work already completed under a superseded edition stands as filed, because the record was made under those terms and is properly interpreted under them.

One boundary should be stated clearly. What is distributed here are copies of published Department of the Army forms; the site is independent, issues nothing of its own, and holds no position in the system it describes. Proponency, prescribing directives and retention schedules operate without reference to it. Consequently nothing here is legal advice and no assurance about acceptance is possible. Questions about a particular entry, a requirement or eligibility belong with TRADOC or your servicing administrative office.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 7595-4-16?
PERFORM AN EXAMINATION OF THE ELBOW
Which edition is current?
May 2014
Who is responsible for this form?
TRADOC
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF

Other forms in the series