Military Forms Guide

DA Form 7591 — MODIFICATION WORK ORDER FIELDING PLAN (MWOFP)

modification work order fielding plan (mwofp)

A newer edition of this form has been issued (04/01/2026). Download the current edition.

Every entry on DA Form 7591 exists because a record system needs it in writing. The form's official title is MODIFICATION WORK ORDER FIELDING PLAN (MWOFP), and it is raised whenever an office must modification work order fielding plan (mwofp) in a way that survives the departure of everyone involved. Memory does not transfer between assignments; a filed document does. The edition dated 04/01/2026, status ACTIVE, is what stands here, spread across 1 page(s) and about 163 fields — a count that reflects how much detail the receiving system requires, not how much the drafter wishes to give. A later edition has since been published, which is why this one remains: records executed against it must still be readable in the terms they were written.

Two offices stand behind the form, and the distinction between them explains most of what follows. ASA (AL&T) is the proponent: it decides what the form asks and revises it when the underlying process changes. AR 750-10 is the prescribing authority: it decides when the form is raised at all and where the completed document travels. Content and occasion are separated deliberately, so that a change in procedure does not require redesigning the page.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.

The signature is the point at which entries become an assertion someone stands behind, so it follows everything else and its absence leaves a draft. Countersignatures by reviewing, approving or witnessing officials each carry their own weight and are dated at signing, which is how the file preserves the order of responsibility. Seen that way, the familiar errors are not clerical trivia: an unanswered mandatory field, digits transposed in an identification number, day and month reversed, and residue from a reused file each put something false or unresolved into a document that will be relied upon.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

The published formats — PDF, XFDL — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

There is no charge and no sign-up. Published documents are distributed as published, without modification.

What the form asks for

  • APPSCHED
  • CLASS
  • ContentArea1
  • DATEA
  • DATEB
  • DISPOSIT
  • DODAAC
  • FACILITY
  • FISYEAR
  • INSTASIG
  • LCMC
  • LCMCSIG
  • LIN
  • MANHOUR
  • MATCOST
  • METHOD
  • MHCOST
  • MIPRADD
  • MIPREMAIL
  • MIPRFAX
  • MIPRPHONE
  • MIPRPOC
  • MODEMAIL
  • MODPHONE

Where the signed form goes is settled by AR 750-10 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

An edition marks the form at a point in a process that keeps moving, and the date printed on the page is what distinguishes one from another. Since a saved file never announces its own obsolescence, compare its date against the current edition before using it again. Prior executions remain valid: the change applies forward, and a record is read against the edition it was written under.

It is worth being plain about what this page is within all of the above. The files are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, offered for download by a site with no official standing and no part in issuing anything. That matters because the machinery described here — proponency, prescribing directives, records schedules — runs entirely elsewhere. Nothing written here is legal advice, and no statement can be made about whether an office will accept a given document. ASA (AL&T) and the administrative office servicing your unit answer questions of entry, requirement and eligibility, and they are the ones positioned to.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 7591?
MODIFICATION WORK ORDER FIELDING PLAN (MWOFP)
Which edition is current?
04/01/2026
Who is responsible for this form?
ASA (AL&T)
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Other forms in the series