Military Forms Guide

DA Form 7574 — REQUEST AND CERTIFICATION FOR INCAPACITATION PAY

incapacitation pay monthly claim form

A newer edition of this form has been issued (01/01/2021). Download the current edition.

Every entry on DA Form 7574 exists because a record system needs it in writing. The form's official title is REQUEST AND CERTIFICATION FOR INCAPACITATION PAY, and it is raised whenever an office must incapacitation pay monthly claim form in a way that survives the departure of everyone involved. Memory does not transfer between assignments; a filed document does. The edition dated 01/01/2021, status ACTIVE, is what stands here, spread across 3 page(s) and about 200 fields — a count that reflects how much detail the receiving system requires, not how much the drafter wishes to give. A later edition has since been published, which is why this one remains: records executed against it must still be readable in the terms they were written.

Behind any Army form sit two separate decisions. What the document asks is settled by G-1, which maintains and revises it. Whether you raise it, and where it goes once signed, is settled by PAM 135-381. That division is the reason a form can outlive several changes in the process it serves.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.

A signature is what converts entries into a record, which is why it comes last and why an unsigned form remains a draft however complete it looks. Where a reviewing official, an approving authority or a witness also signs, each adds a distinct attestation, and each dates the day of signing rather than the day of preparation — the dates trace the sequence of responsibility. The recurring defects are worth knowing precisely because they defeat that purpose: an empty mandatory field leaves an obligation unmet, transposed identification digits attach the record to nobody, a date with day and month reversed puts events in the wrong order, and entries left in a reused working copy assert facts nobody intended.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

Why several files for one page? Because the form has to be completed in a headquarters and in places without a workstation, and PDF, XFDL covers both. The fillable pdf holds interactive fields that fix each entry in place and remove handwriting from the equation. The printable pdf is the same layout without those fields, meant for a printer and a pen. Neither is a lesser copy of the other; each answers a condition the other cannot.

Software determines whether an entry lasts. A browser viewer is designed for reading, and several will take typed input into fields without any means of writing it back — the text is simply absent when you reopen. A standalone reader handles the form structure properly. The xfdl file is IBM Lotus Forms, carried in Army systems for the routing and signature support it provides, which is why the Lotus Forms Viewer is its only reader.

There is no charge and no sign-up. Published documents are distributed as published, without modification.

What the form asks for

  • ADDRESS
  • AMOUNT
  • AMT_LOST
  • AMT_RCD
  • APPROVE
  • APP_AUTH
  • CIVIL_A
  • CIVIL_A_1
  • CIVIL_B
  • CIVIL_B_1
  • CIVIL_C
  • CIVIL_C_1
  • CIVIL_D
  • CIVIL_D_1
  • CIVIL_E
  • CIVIL_E_1
  • CLAIM
  • CMD_INIT
  • COMMANDER
  • CURR
  • CURRENT
  • ContentArea1
  • ContentArea2
  • ContentArea3

Disposition is prescribed, not chosen. PAM 135-381 names the destination, whether that is a specific office, the unit administrative channel or the personal record, and the applicable records schedule governs how long it survives there. Both rules exist to keep the file consistent across offices with different habits. Take your copy before the document leaves, since it will not come back.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

An edition marks the form at a point in a process that keeps moving, and the date printed on the page is what distinguishes one from another. Since a saved file never announces its own obsolescence, compare its date against the current edition before using it again. Prior executions remain valid: the change applies forward, and a record is read against the edition it was written under.

One boundary should be stated clearly. What is distributed here are copies of published Department of the Army forms; the site is independent, issues nothing of its own, and holds no position in the system it describes. Proponency, prescribing directives and retention schedules operate without reference to it. Consequently nothing here is legal advice and no assurance about acceptance is possible. Questions about a particular entry, a requirement or eligibility belong with G-1 or your servicing administrative office.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 7574?
REQUEST AND CERTIFICATION FOR INCAPACITATION PAY
Which edition is current?
01/01/2021
Who is responsible for this form?
G-1
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. 14-REQUIRES PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT (AR 340-21)
  2. 42-ITEM ONLY PRODUCED IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA

Other forms in the series