Military Forms Guide

DA Form 597 — ARMY SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS` TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) NONSCHOLARSHIP CADET CONTRACT

army senior reserve officers` training corps (rotc) nonscholarship cadet contract

A newer edition of this form has been issued (04/01/2023). Download the current edition.

The reason DA Form 597 looks the way it does is that a file has to speak for itself. Officially ARMY SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS` TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) NONSCHOLARSHIP CADET CONTRACT, it serves to army senior reserve officers` training corps (rotc) nonscholarship cadet contract, and the record it produces outlasts the people and the circumstances behind it. Edition 04/01/2023, status ACTIVE, is the version published here: 5 page(s), close to 200 fields, each one present because some later reader will need that fact without being able to ask for it. Because a subsequent edition has appeared, this copy stays available — a record made under one edition is interpreted under that edition.

Two offices stand behind the form, and the distinction between them explains most of what follows. G-1 is the proponent: it decides what the form asks and revises it when the underlying process changes. AR 145-1 is the prescribing authority: it decides when the form is raised at all and where the completed document travels. Content and occasion are separated deliberately, so that a change in procedure does not require redesigning the page.

Identification precedes substance for a structural reason. Name, identification number, organisation and date of preparation are how the finished document is located in a file or a database; the body of the form is what someone reads after the search has succeeded. Spell the name as official records spell it, since the search runs against those records and not against habit.

The rules of entry all trace back to the page being fixed in advance. Tabbing follows the order built into the form, which usually matches how the page reads and misses less than clicking. An exclusive group discards the earlier selection because contradictory entries would make the record unusable. One-line fields have no wrap because print positions are predetermined, so an overlong entry displays fully and prints truncated. Longer text goes to the remarks area or a continuation, both provided for exactly that. Where nothing applies, the nil mark is entered — a blank leaves the reader unable to tell a considered answer from a skipped one.

The signature is the point at which entries become an assertion someone stands behind, so it follows everything else and its absence leaves a draft. Countersignatures by reviewing, approving or witnessing officials each carry their own weight and are dated at signing, which is how the file preserves the order of responsibility. Seen that way, the familiar errors are not clerical trivia: an unanswered mandatory field, digits transposed in an identification number, day and month reversed, and residue from a reused file each put something false or unresolved into a document that will be relied upon.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

The published formats — PDF, XFDL — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

Software determines whether an entry lasts. A browser viewer is designed for reading, and several will take typed input into fields without any means of writing it back — the text is simply absent when you reopen. A standalone reader handles the form structure properly. The xfdl file is IBM Lotus Forms, carried in Army systems for the routing and signature support it provides, which is why the Lotus Forms Viewer is its only reader.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • COMP_DATE
  • ContentArea1
  • DATE_EDUC
  • DOB
  • INSTIT_ADD
  • INSTIT_NAM
  • MAJOR
  • MSII
  • MSIII
  • MSIV
  • MSV
  • Mcollection
  • Page1
  • Page2
  • Page3
  • Page4
  • Page5
  • PageArea1
  • R100
  • R101
  • R102
  • R103
  • R104
  • R106

Where the signed form goes is settled by AR 145-1 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

Editions change because the process changes, and the printed edition date is the only marker of which version a page belongs to. A copy saved locally cannot know it has been superseded, so the date on it is compared against the edition in force before reuse. Records already executed under an earlier edition are left alone — a document is read under the terms it was made, and reopening completed files to match a later form would falsify the account.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to G-1 or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 597?
ARMY SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS` TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) NONSCHOLARSHIP CADET CONTRACT
Which edition is current?
04/01/2023
Who is responsible for this form?
G-1
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. PRIVACY STATEMENT

Other forms in the series