Military Forms Guide

DA Form 5339 — OCS APPLICANT`S COMMANDERS EVALUATION SHEET

ocs applicant`s commanders evaluation sheet

A newer edition of this form has been issued (06/01/2026). Download the current edition.

Every entry on DA Form 5339 exists because a record system needs it in writing. The form's official title is OCS APPLICANT`S COMMANDERS EVALUATION SHEET, and it is raised whenever an office must ocs applicant`s commanders evaluation sheet in a way that survives the departure of everyone involved. Memory does not transfer between assignments; a filed document does. The edition dated 06/01/2026, status ACTIVE, is what stands here, spread across 1 page(s) and about 126 fields — a count that reflects how much detail the receiving system requires, not how much the drafter wishes to give. A later edition has since been published, which is why this one remains: records executed against it must still be readable in the terms they were written.

The form has an author and an occasion, held by different authorities. G-1 owns the content and reshapes it when what is being recorded changes. AR 350-51 governs the event that calls for the form and the route the finished document takes afterwards. Keeping those two apart is what allows a procedure to be amended without the page being rebuilt each time.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

The rules of entry all trace back to the page being fixed in advance. Tabbing follows the order built into the form, which usually matches how the page reads and misses less than clicking. An exclusive group discards the earlier selection because contradictory entries would make the record unusable. One-line fields have no wrap because print positions are predetermined, so an overlong entry displays fully and prints truncated. Longer text goes to the remarks area or a continuation, both provided for exactly that. Where nothing applies, the nil mark is entered — a blank leaves the reader unable to tell a considered answer from a skipped one.

A signature is what converts entries into a record, which is why it comes last and why an unsigned form remains a draft however complete it looks. Where a reviewing official, an approving authority or a witness also signs, each adds a distinct attestation, and each dates the day of signing rather than the day of preparation — the dates trace the sequence of responsibility. The recurring defects are worth knowing precisely because they defeat that purpose: an empty mandatory field leaves an obligation unmet, transposed identification digits attach the record to nobody, a date with day and month reversed puts events in the wrong order, and entries left in a reused working copy assert facts nobody intended.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

Formats exist because completion happens under different conditions, not because anyone wanted variety. The published set is PDF. A fillable pdf carries live entry objects, so typed text lands in fixed positions and stays legible whoever reads it later. A printable pdf drops those objects and leaves the page as an image, which is what an office needs where a screen is unavailable and a pen is not. The document itself is unchanged between them; what differs is the circumstance each anticipates.

Software determines whether an entry lasts. A browser viewer is designed for reading, and several will take typed input into fields without any means of writing it back — the text is simply absent when you reopen. A standalone reader handles the form structure properly.

Downloads are free and unregistered. The material was published for general use, and the files are passed on unaltered.

What the form asks for

  • ContentArea1
  • DATE
  • DUTIES
  • HEIGHT
  • NAME
  • Page1
  • R100
  • R101
  • R102
  • R103
  • R104
  • R105
  • R106
  • R107
  • R108
  • R109
  • R110
  • R111
  • R112
  • R113
  • R114
  • R115
  • R116
  • R117

Where the signed form goes is settled by AR 350-51 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Forms cluster by series and number for the same reason files do: shared proponency and a shared prescribing directive usually mean a shared process. So a document in the DA series referenced on the face of another is generally part of the same transaction, and continuation sheets, cover sheets and transmittals belong to the package from the outset rather than arriving after a query.

Editions change because the process changes, and the printed edition date is the only marker of which version a page belongs to. A copy saved locally cannot know it has been superseded, so the date on it is compared against the edition in force before reuse. Records already executed under an earlier edition are left alone — a document is read under the terms it was made, and reopening completed files to match a later form would falsify the account.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to G-1 or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 5339?
OCS APPLICANT`S COMMANDERS EVALUATION SHEET
Which edition is current?
06/01/2026
Who is responsible for this form?
G-1
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, PDF

Other forms in the series