Military Forms Guide

DA Form 5188 — MEDICAL REPORT ON APPLICANT FOR CERTIFICATION TO PROVIDE CARE FOR CHILDREN OR ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES

medical report on applicant for certification to provide care for children or adults with disabilities

A newer edition of this form has been issued (02/01/2026). Download the current edition.

Every entry on DA Form 5188 exists because a record system needs it in writing. The form's official title is MEDICAL REPORT ON APPLICANT FOR CERTIFICATION TO PROVIDE CARE FOR CHILDREN OR ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES, and it is raised whenever an office must medical report on applicant for certification to provide care for children or adults with disabilities in a way that survives the departure of everyone involved. Memory does not transfer between assignments; a filed document does. The edition dated 02/01/2026, status ACTIVE, is what stands here, spread across 1 page(s) and about 93 fields — a count that reflects how much detail the receiving system requires, not how much the drafter wishes to give. A later edition has since been published, which is why this one remains: records executed against it must still be readable in the terms they were written.

Behind any Army form sit two separate decisions. What the document asks is settled by TSG, which maintains and revises it. Whether you raise it, and where it goes once signed, is settled by AR 608-75. That division is the reason a form can outlive several changes in the process it serves.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.

The signature is the point at which entries become an assertion someone stands behind, so it follows everything else and its absence leaves a draft. Countersignatures by reviewing, approving or witnessing officials each carry their own weight and are dated at signing, which is how the file preserves the order of responsibility. Seen that way, the familiar errors are not clerical trivia: an unanswered mandatory field, digits transposed in an identification number, day and month reversed, and residue from a reused file each put something false or unresolved into a document that will be relied upon.

Behind the Privacy Act statement is a requirement that anyone asked for personal data be told, in advance, under what authority it is sought, for what purpose, who else routinely sees it, and whether refusal is possible. Reading it after completing the fields defeats its function. And the completed form is itself a personal record from that point on, subject to the handling rules such records carry.

Download the form

The published formats — PDF, XFDL — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • ContentArea1
  • DATE
  • DATESIGN
  • DATE_A
  • DATE_B
  • EXPLAIN_A
  • EXPLAIN_B
  • EXPLAIN_C
  • NAME
  • NO_A
  • NO_B
  • NO_C
  • Page1
  • R77
  • R78
  • R79
  • R80
  • R81
  • R82
  • R83
  • R84
  • R85
  • R86
  • R87

The routing in AR 608-75 decides where the document goes — a named office, the administrative channel, or the individual's file — and the records schedule for the series decides how long it stays. Neither is a local judgement, because a record system loses its meaning if each office keeps things for its own preferred interval. Copy the form before submitting it.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

Revision follows the process, which is why editions appear without a fixed interval, and the printed date rather than any version number identifies them. Nothing on a stored copy signals that it has aged; the check is manual. Work already completed under a superseded edition stands as filed, because the record was made under those terms and is properly interpreted under them.

One boundary should be stated clearly. What is distributed here are copies of published Department of the Army forms; the site is independent, issues nothing of its own, and holds no position in the system it describes. Proponency, prescribing directives and retention schedules operate without reference to it. Consequently nothing here is legal advice and no assurance about acceptance is possible. Questions about a particular entry, a requirement or eligibility belong with TSG or your servicing administrative office.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 5188?
MEDICAL REPORT ON APPLICANT FOR CERTIFICATION TO PROVIDE CARE FOR CHILDREN OR ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES
Which edition is current?
02/01/2026
Who is responsible for this form?
TSG
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Other forms in the series