Military Forms Guide

DA Form 4789 — STATEMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO RETENTION INCENTIVE

statement of entitlement to retention incentive

A newer edition of this form has been issued (04/01/2023). Download the current edition.

Administrative documents are written for readers who were not present, and DA Form 4789 is no exception. Titled STATEMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO RETENTION INCENTIVE, it is used to statement of entitlement to retention incentive — a transaction that means little in conversation and a great deal in a file. The published edition here carries the date 04/01/2023 and the status ACTIVE. Its 1 page(s) and roughly 93 fields are sized to what the record must prove years later, which is always more than the moment appears to need. A newer edition exists. This one is retained because the documents completed on it were completed under its terms and are read under them.

The form has an author and an occasion, held by different authorities. G-1 owns the content and reshapes it when what is being recorded changes. AR 601-280 governs the event that calls for the form and the route the finished document takes afterwards. Keeping those two apart is what allows a procedure to be amended without the page being rebuilt each time.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

The rules of entry all trace back to the page being fixed in advance. Tabbing follows the order built into the form, which usually matches how the page reads and misses less than clicking. An exclusive group discards the earlier selection because contradictory entries would make the record unusable. One-line fields have no wrap because print positions are predetermined, so an overlong entry displays fully and prints truncated. Longer text goes to the remarks area or a continuation, both provided for exactly that. Where nothing applies, the nil mark is entered — a blank leaves the reader unable to tell a considered answer from a skipped one.

Signing is the act that makes the document evidence, and until it happens the entries are only a proposal. Additional signatures — reviewer, approver, witness — each stand for a separate judgement, dated when applied so the record shows who accepted what and in what order. The common faults all damage that record in the same way: a blank mandatory field breaks the chain of required answers, swapped digits in an identification number detach the document from its subject, an inverted day and month misplaces it in time, and stale data from a reused copy states things nobody meant to state.

Behind the Privacy Act statement is a requirement that anyone asked for personal data be told, in advance, under what authority it is sought, for what purpose, who else routinely sees it, and whether refusal is possible. Reading it after completing the fields defeats its function. And the completed form is itself a personal record from that point on, subject to the handling rules such records carry.

Download the form

Formats exist because completion happens under different conditions, not because anyone wanted variety. The published set is PDF, XFDL. A fillable pdf carries live entry objects, so typed text lands in fixed positions and stays legible whoever reads it later. A printable pdf drops those objects and leaves the page as an image, which is what an office needs where a screen is unavailable and a pen is not. The document itself is unchanged between them; what differs is the circumstance each anticipates.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • AOS_END
  • AOS_START
  • BASE_AMT
  • CCID
  • DA_1695
  • DA_3340
  • DD_4
  • Date_Counselor
  • Date_Recipent
  • Form_Rectangle
  • INCENTIVE_AMT
  • MOS_A1
  • MOS_A2
  • Master_Page1
  • Name
  • Name_Couselor
  • ORGANIZATION
  • PLUS_AMT
  • Page1
  • R66
  • R72
  • R78
  • R79
  • R80

Disposition is prescribed, not chosen. AR 601-280 names the destination, whether that is a specific office, the unit administrative channel or the personal record, and the applicable records schedule governs how long it survives there. Both rules exist to keep the file consistent across offices with different habits. Take your copy before the document leaves, since it will not come back.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

An edition marks the form at a point in a process that keeps moving, and the date printed on the page is what distinguishes one from another. Since a saved file never announces its own obsolescence, compare its date against the current edition before using it again. Prior executions remain valid: the change applies forward, and a record is read against the edition it was written under.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to G-1 or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 4789?
STATEMENT OF ENTITLEMENT TO RETENTION INCENTIVE
Which edition is current?
04/01/2023
Who is responsible for this form?
G-1
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. , PRIVACY ACT

Other forms in the series