Military Forms Guide

DA Form 3612 — NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RATING

nonappropriated fund instrumentality emp[loyee performance rating

A newer edition of this form has been issued (06/01/2025). Download the current edition.

Every entry on DA Form 3612 exists because a record system needs it in writing. The form's official title is NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RATING, and it is raised whenever an office must nonappropriated fund instrumentality emp[loyee performance rating in a way that survives the departure of everyone involved. Memory does not transfer between assignments; a filed document does. The edition dated 06/01/2025, status ACTIVE, is what stands here, spread across 1 page(s) and about 89 fields — a count that reflects how much detail the receiving system requires, not how much the drafter wishes to give. A later edition has since been published, which is why this one remains: records executed against it must still be readable in the terms they were written.

Behind any Army form sit two separate decisions. What the document asks is settled by G-1, which maintains and revises it. Whether you raise it, and where it goes once signed, is settled by AR 215-3. That division is the reason a form can outlive several changes in the process it serves.

Identification precedes substance for a structural reason. Name, identification number, organisation and date of preparation are how the finished document is located in a file or a database; the body of the form is what someone reads after the search has succeeded. Spell the name as official records spell it, since the search runs against those records and not against habit.

The rules of entry all trace back to the page being fixed in advance. Tabbing follows the order built into the form, which usually matches how the page reads and misses less than clicking. An exclusive group discards the earlier selection because contradictory entries would make the record unusable. One-line fields have no wrap because print positions are predetermined, so an overlong entry displays fully and prints truncated. Longer text goes to the remarks area or a continuation, both provided for exactly that. Where nothing applies, the nil mark is entered — a blank leaves the reader unable to tell a considered answer from a skipped one.

The signature is the point at which entries become an assertion someone stands behind, so it follows everything else and its absence leaves a draft. Countersignatures by reviewing, approving or witnessing officials each carry their own weight and are dated at signing, which is how the file preserves the order of responsibility. Seen that way, the familiar errors are not clerical trivia: an unanswered mandatory field, digits transposed in an identification number, day and month reversed, and residue from a reused file each put something false or unresolved into a document that will be relied upon.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

The published formats — PDF, XFDL — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

The choice of application decides whether your work survives. Browsers render pdfs as documents to be read; where a viewer shows fields without a mechanism to store them, typed text disappears when the tab closes, and nothing announces the loss. A full reader treats the file as a form and preserves entries on save. The xfdl format comes from IBM Lotus Forms, used across Army systems because of the routing and signature functions built into it, and it opens in the Lotus Forms Viewer alone.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • APP_DAT
  • ContentArea1
  • EMP_DAT
  • EMP_OFFC
  • GRADE
  • NAME
  • NUMBER
  • PER_FRM
  • PER_TO
  • PSTITL
  • Page1
  • R80
  • R81
  • R83
  • R84
  • R85
  • R86
  • R87
  • R88
  • R89
  • R90
  • R91
  • R92
  • R93

Where the signed form goes is settled by AR 215-3 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

Revision follows the process, which is why editions appear without a fixed interval, and the printed date rather than any version number identifies them. Nothing on a stored copy signals that it has aged; the check is manual. Work already completed under a superseded edition stands as filed, because the record was made under those terms and is properly interpreted under them.

One boundary should be stated clearly. What is distributed here are copies of published Department of the Army forms; the site is independent, issues nothing of its own, and holds no position in the system it describes. Proponency, prescribing directives and retention schedules operate without reference to it. Consequently nothing here is legal advice and no assurance about acceptance is possible. Questions about a particular entry, a requirement or eligibility belong with G-1 or your servicing administrative office.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 3612?
NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RATING
Which edition is current?
06/01/2025
Who is responsible for this form?
G-1
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Other forms in the series