Military Forms Guide

DA Form 3365 — AUTHORIZATION FOR MEDICAL WARNING TAG

authorization for medical warning tag

The reason DA Form 3365 looks the way it does is that a file has to speak for itself. Officially AUTHORIZATION FOR MEDICAL WARNING TAG, it serves to authorization for medical warning tag, and the record it produces outlasts the people and the circumstances behind it. Edition 08/01/1968, status ACTIVE, is the version published here: 1 page(s), close to 200 fields, each one present because some later reader will need that fact without being able to ask for it.

Behind any Army form sit two separate decisions. What the document asks is settled by TSG, which maintains and revises it. Whether you raise it, and where it goes once signed, is settled by AR 40-66. That division is the reason a form can outlive several changes in the process it serves.

Retrieval governs the order of entry. The head of the form takes name, identification number, unit and date, and those values become the handles by which the record is found later — the substantive blocks are never searched on. This is why the spelling must match official records exactly rather than approximately.

The rules of entry all trace back to the page being fixed in advance. Tabbing follows the order built into the form, which usually matches how the page reads and misses less than clicking. An exclusive group discards the earlier selection because contradictory entries would make the record unusable. One-line fields have no wrap because print positions are predetermined, so an overlong entry displays fully and prints truncated. Longer text goes to the remarks area or a continuation, both provided for exactly that. Where nothing applies, the nil mark is entered — a blank leaves the reader unable to tell a considered answer from a skipped one.

Signing is the act that makes the document evidence, and until it happens the entries are only a proposal. Additional signatures — reviewer, approver, witness — each stand for a separate judgement, dated when applied so the record shows who accepted what and in what order. The common faults all damage that record in the same way: a blank mandatory field breaks the chain of required answers, swapped digits in an identification number detach the document from its subject, an inverted day and month misplaces it in time, and stale data from a reused copy states things nobody meant to state.

Behind the Privacy Act statement is a requirement that anyone asked for personal data be told, in advance, under what authority it is sought, for what purpose, who else routinely sees it, and whether refusal is possible. Reading it after completing the fields defeats its function. And the completed form is itself a personal record from that point on, subject to the handling rules such records carry.

Download the form

The published formats — PDF, XFDL — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • ADDRESS
  • ContentArea1
  • DATE
  • DATE_DLVD
  • FROM
  • GRADE
  • HOME_ADRS
  • ID_NO
  • LINEFIVE
  • LINEFIVE_1
  • LINEFIVE_10
  • LINEFIVE_11
  • LINEFIVE_12
  • LINEFIVE_13
  • LINEFIVE_14
  • LINEFIVE_15
  • LINEFIVE_16
  • LINEFIVE_17
  • LINEFIVE_2
  • LINEFIVE_3
  • LINEFIVE_4
  • LINEFIVE_5
  • LINEFIVE_6
  • LINEFIVE_7

The routing in AR 40-66 decides where the document goes — a named office, the administrative channel, or the individual's file — and the records schedule for the series decides how long it stays. Neither is a local judgement, because a record system loses its meaning if each office keeps things for its own preferred interval. Copy the form before submitting it.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

Editions change because the process changes, and the printed edition date is the only marker of which version a page belongs to. A copy saved locally cannot know it has been superseded, so the date on it is compared against the edition in force before reuse. Records already executed under an earlier edition are left alone — a document is read under the terms it was made, and reopening completed files to match a later form would falsify the account.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to TSG or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 3365?
AUTHORIZATION FOR MEDICAL WARNING TAG
Which edition is current?
08/01/1968
Who is responsible for this form?
TSG
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. 14-REQUIRES PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT (AR 340-21)
  2. 42-ITEM ONLY PRODUCED IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA

Other forms in the series