Military Forms Guide

DA Form 2984 — VERY SERIOUSLY ILL/SERIOUSLY ILL/SPECIAL CATEGORY PATIENT REPORT

very seriously ill/seriously ill/special category patient report

A newer edition of this form has been issued (04/01/2009). Download the current edition.

Administrative documents are written for readers who were not present, and DA Form 2984 is no exception. Titled VERY SERIOUSLY ILL/SERIOUSLY ILL/SPECIAL CATEGORY PATIENT REPORT, it is used to very seriously ill/seriously ill/special category patient report — a transaction that means little in conversation and a great deal in a file. The published edition here carries the date 04/01/2009 and the status ACTIVE. Its 1 page(s) and roughly 188 fields are sized to what the record must prove years later, which is always more than the moment appears to need. A newer edition exists. This one is retained because the documents completed on it were completed under its terms and are read under them.

Two offices stand behind the form, and the distinction between them explains most of what follows. TSG is the proponent: it decides what the form asks and revises it when the underlying process changes. AR 40-400 is the prescribing authority: it decides when the form is raised at all and where the completed document travels. Content and occasion are separated deliberately, so that a change in procedure does not require redesigning the page.

Identification precedes substance for a structural reason. Name, identification number, organisation and date of preparation are how the finished document is located in a file or a database; the body of the form is what someone reads after the search has succeeded. Spell the name as official records spell it, since the search runs against those records and not against habit.

Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.

The signature is the point at which entries become an assertion someone stands behind, so it follows everything else and its absence leaves a draft. Countersignatures by reviewing, approving or witnessing officials each carry their own weight and are dated at signing, which is how the file preserves the order of responsibility. Seen that way, the familiar errors are not clerical trivia: an unanswered mandatory field, digits transposed in an identification number, day and month reversed, and residue from a reused file each put something false or unresolved into a document that will be relied upon.

Personal information may not be gathered silently, and the Privacy Act statement is how that obligation is met on paper: it names the collection authority, the purpose, the routine uses and whether disclosure is mandatory. Because it exists to inform a decision, it belongs before the fields it covers rather than after them. A filled copy then holds personal data and is stored and transmitted under the corresponding safeguards.

Download the form

Formats exist because completion happens under different conditions, not because anyone wanted variety. The published set is PDF, XFDL. A fillable pdf carries live entry objects, so typed text lands in fixed positions and stays legible whoever reads it later. A printable pdf drops those objects and leaves the page as an image, which is what an office needs where a screen is unavailable and a pen is not. The document itself is unchanged between them; what differs is the circumstance each anticipates.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • CHNG_A
  • CHNG_B
  • CHNG_C
  • CHNG_D
  • CHNG_E
  • CHNG_F
  • ContentArea1
  • DATE_A
  • DATE_B
  • DATE_B_1
  • DATE_B_2
  • DATE_B_3
  • DATE_B_4
  • DATE_B_5
  • DATE_C
  • DAYS
  • DIAGNSIS
  • HOUR
  • HOUR_A
  • HOUR_A_1
  • HOUR_A_2
  • HOUR_A_3
  • HOUR_A_4
  • HOUR_A_5

Where the signed form goes is settled by AR 40-400 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.

An edition marks the form at a point in a process that keeps moving, and the date printed on the page is what distinguishes one from another. Since a saved file never announces its own obsolescence, compare its date against the current edition before using it again. Prior executions remain valid: the change applies forward, and a record is read against the edition it was written under.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to TSG or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 2984?
VERY SERIOUSLY ILL/SERIOUSLY ILL/SPECIAL CATEGORY PATIENT REPORT
Which edition is current?
04/01/2009
Who is responsible for this form?
TSG
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. 42-ITEM ONLY PRODUCED IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA,

Other forms in the series