Military Forms Guide

DA Form 2408-20 — OIL ANALYSIS LOG

oil analysis log

The reason DA Form 2408-20 looks the way it does is that a file has to speak for itself. Officially OIL ANALYSIS LOG, it serves to oil analysis log, and the record it produces outlasts the people and the circumstances behind it. Edition 10/01/1997, status ACTIVE, is the version published here: 2 page(s), close to 200 fields, each one present because some later reader will need that fact without being able to ask for it.

Behind any Army form sit two separate decisions. What the document asks is settled by G-4, which maintains and revises it. Whether you raise it, and where it goes once signed, is settled by PAM 738-751, PAM 750-8. That division is the reason a form can outlive several changes in the process it serves.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

The rules of entry all trace back to the page being fixed in advance. Tabbing follows the order built into the form, which usually matches how the page reads and misses less than clicking. An exclusive group discards the earlier selection because contradictory entries would make the record unusable. One-line fields have no wrap because print positions are predetermined, so an overlong entry displays fully and prints truncated. Longer text goes to the remarks area or a continuation, both provided for exactly that. Where nothing applies, the nil mark is entered — a blank leaves the reader unable to tell a considered answer from a skipped one.

A signature is what converts entries into a record, which is why it comes last and why an unsigned form remains a draft however complete it looks. Where a reviewing official, an approving authority or a witness also signs, each adds a distinct attestation, and each dates the day of signing rather than the day of preparation — the dates trace the sequence of responsibility. The recurring defects are worth knowing precisely because they defeat that purpose: an empty mandatory field leaves an obligation unmet, transposed identification digits attach the record to nobody, a date with day and month reversed puts events in the wrong order, and entries left in a reused working copy assert facts nobody intended.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

Why several files for one page? Because the form has to be completed in a headquarters and in places without a workstation, and PDF, XFDL covers both. The fillable pdf holds interactive fields that fix each entry in place and remove handwriting from the equation. The printable pdf is the same layout without those fields, meant for a printer and a pen. Neither is a lesser copy of the other; each answers a condition the other cannot.

The choice of application decides whether your work survives. Browsers render pdfs as documents to be read; where a viewer shows fields without a mechanism to store them, typed text disappears when the tab closes, and nothing announces the loss. A full reader treats the file as a form and preserves entries on save. The xfdl format comes from IBM Lotus Forms, used across Army systems because of the routing and signature functions built into it, and it opens in the Lotus Forms Viewer alone.

There is no charge and no sign-up. Published documents are distributed as published, without modification.

What the form asks for

  • AcftHrs
  • AcftHrsOil
  • COMP
  • COMP_1
  • COMP_10
  • COMP_11
  • COMP_2
  • COMP_3
  • COMP_4
  • COMP_5
  • COMP_6
  • COMP_7
  • COMP_8
  • COMP_9
  • COMP_A
  • COMP_A_1
  • COMP_A_2
  • COMP_A_3
  • COMP_A_4
  • COMP_A_5
  • COMP_A_6
  • COMP_A_7
  • ContentArea1
  • ContentArea2

The routing in PAM 738-751, PAM 750-8 decides where the document goes — a named office, the administrative channel, or the individual's file — and the records schedule for the series decides how long it stays. Neither is a local judgement, because a record system loses its meaning if each office keeps things for its own preferred interval. Copy the form before submitting it.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

Editions change because the process changes, and the printed edition date is the only marker of which version a page belongs to. A copy saved locally cannot know it has been superseded, so the date on it is compared against the edition in force before reuse. Records already executed under an earlier edition are left alone — a document is read under the terms it was made, and reopening completed files to match a later form would falsify the account.

One boundary should be stated clearly. What is distributed here are copies of published Department of the Army forms; the site is independent, issues nothing of its own, and holds no position in the system it describes. Proponency, prescribing directives and retention schedules operate without reference to it. Consequently nothing here is legal advice and no assurance about acceptance is possible. Questions about a particular entry, a requirement or eligibility belong with G-4 or your servicing administrative office.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 2408-20?
OIL ANALYSIS LOG
Which edition is current?
10/01/1997
Who is responsible for this form?
G-4
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. 42-ITEM ONLY PRODUCED IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA,

Other forms in the series