Military Forms Guide

DA Form 2397-4 — TECHNICAL REPORT OF US ARMY AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT PART V - SUMMARY OF WITNESS INTERVIEW

technical report of u.s. army aircraft accident part v - summary of witness interview

The reason DA Form 2397-4 looks the way it does is that a file has to speak for itself. Officially TECHNICAL REPORT OF US ARMY AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT PART V - SUMMARY OF WITNESS INTERVIEW, it serves to technical report of u.s. army aircraft accident part v - summary of witness interview, and the record it produces outlasts the people and the circumstances behind it. Edition February 2009, status not stated, is the version published here: 2 page(s), close to 95 fields, each one present because some later reader will need that fact without being able to ask for it.

The form has an author and an occasion, held by different authorities. OCSA owns the content and reshapes it when what is being recorded changes. PAM 385-40 governs the event that calls for the form and the route the finished document takes afterwards. Keeping those two apart is what allows a procedure to be amended without the page being rebuilt each time.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

Tab order is not a convenience feature; it was fixed when the form was built and generally traces the page, so following it produces the sequence the designer intended and leaves fewer gaps than a mouse. Exclusive option groups clear the previous selection because the record is not permitted to hold two contradictory answers. Single-line fields do not wrap for the same reason the layout is fixed: the printed page has to fall in known positions, so text past the field width is cut at the margin even though the screen still shows it whole. Overflow belongs in remarks or on a continuation, where there is room designed for it. And an inapplicable field is marked rather than skipped, since a blank tells a later reader nothing about whether the question was considered.

Signing is the act that makes the document evidence, and until it happens the entries are only a proposal. Additional signatures — reviewer, approver, witness — each stand for a separate judgement, dated when applied so the record shows who accepted what and in what order. The common faults all damage that record in the same way: a blank mandatory field breaks the chain of required answers, swapped digits in an identification number detach the document from its subject, an inverted day and month misplaces it in time, and stale data from a reused copy states things nobody meant to state.

Personal information may not be gathered silently, and the Privacy Act statement is how that obligation is met on paper: it names the collection authority, the purpose, the routine uses and whether disclosure is mandatory. Because it exists to inform a decision, it belongs before the fields it covers rather than after them. A filled copy then holds personal data and is stored and transmitted under the corresponding safeguards.

Download the form

Formats exist because completion happens under different conditions, not because anyone wanted variety. The published set is PDF, XFDL. A fillable pdf carries live entry objects, so typed text lands in fixed positions and stays legible whoever reads it later. A printable pdf drops those objects and leaves the page as an image, which is what an office needs where a screen is unavailable and a pen is not. The document itself is unchanged between them; what differs is the circumstance each anticipates.

Software determines whether an entry lasts. A browser viewer is designed for reading, and several will take typed input into fields without any means of writing it back — the text is simply absent when you reopen. A standalone reader handles the form structure properly. The xfdl file is IBM Lotus Forms, carried in Army systems for the routing and signature support it provides, which is why the Lotus Forms Viewer is its only reader.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • ADDRESS
  • AGE
  • Aircraft_SN
  • Case_Date
  • Case_Time
  • ContentArea1
  • Decline
  • EXPERNC
  • GRADE
  • INTERVWR
  • INTRVIEW
  • Interviewer_Date
  • LOCATE
  • Line1
  • Line2
  • Line3
  • NO_A
  • Name_Witness
  • OCCUP
  • Page1
  • Page2
  • R26
  • R39
  • R41

The routing in PAM 385-40 decides where the document goes — a named office, the administrative channel, or the individual's file — and the records schedule for the series decides how long it stays. Neither is a local judgement, because a record system loses its meaning if each office keeps things for its own preferred interval. Copy the form before submitting it.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

An edition marks the form at a point in a process that keeps moving, and the date printed on the page is what distinguishes one from another. Since a saved file never announces its own obsolescence, compare its date against the current edition before using it again. Prior executions remain valid: the change applies forward, and a record is read against the edition it was written under.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to OCSA or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 2397-4?
TECHNICAL REPORT OF US ARMY AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT PART V - SUMMARY OF WITNESS INTERVIEW
Which edition is current?
February 2009
Who is responsible for this form?
OCSA
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL

Other forms in the series