Administrative documents are written for readers who were not present, and DA Form 1713-3 is no exception. Titled DAILY WATER PRODUCTION LOG - 125 GPH LWP, it is used to daily water production log - 125 gph lwp — a transaction that means little in conversation and a great deal in a file. The published edition here carries the date September 2015 and the status not stated. Its 1 page(s) and roughly 200 fields are sized to what the record must prove years later, which is always more than the moment appears to need.
Two offices stand behind the form, and the distinction between them explains most of what follows. TRADOC is the proponent: it decides what the form asks and revises it when the underlying process changes. ATP 4-44 is the prescribing authority: it decides when the form is raised at all and where the completed document travels. Content and occasion are separated deliberately, so that a change in procedure does not require redesigning the page.
Retrieval governs the order of entry. The head of the form takes name, identification number, unit and date, and those values become the handles by which the record is found later — the substantive blocks are never searched on. This is why the spelling must match official records exactly rather than approximately.
Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.
Signing is the act that makes the document evidence, and until it happens the entries are only a proposal. Additional signatures — reviewer, approver, witness — each stand for a separate judgement, dated when applied so the record shows who accepted what and in what order. The common faults all damage that record in the same way: a blank mandatory field breaks the chain of required answers, swapped digits in an identification number detach the document from its subject, an inverted day and month misplaces it in time, and stale data from a reused copy states things nobody meant to state.
Behind the Privacy Act statement is a requirement that anyone asked for personal data be told, in advance, under what authority it is sought, for what purpose, who else routinely sees it, and whether refusal is possible. Reading it after completing the fields defeats its function. And the completed form is itself a personal record from that point on, subject to the handling rules such records carry.
Download the form
The published formats — PDF — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.
Software determines whether an entry lasts. A browser viewer is designed for reading, and several will take typed input into fields without any means of writing it back — the text is simply absent when you reopen. A standalone reader handles the form structure properly.
No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.
What the form asks for
- ANTI_SPEED
- ANTI_SPEED_1
- ANTI_SPEED_10
- ANTI_SPEED_11
- ANTI_SPEED_12
- ANTI_SPEED_13
- ANTI_SPEED_2
- ANTI_SPEED_3
- ANTI_SPEED_4
- ANTI_SPEED_5
- ANTI_SPEED_6
- ANTI_SPEED_7
- ANTI_SPEED_8
- ANTI_SPEED_9
- ANTI_STROKE
- ANTI_STROKE_1
- ANTI_STROKE_10
- ANTI_STROKE_11
- ANTI_STROKE_12
- ANTI_STROKE_13
- ANTI_STROKE_2
- ANTI_STROKE_3
- ANTI_STROKE_4
- ANTI_STROKE_5
Where the signed form goes is settled by ATP 4-44 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.
Series and number are how the DA series signals which documents belong together, and the grouping follows real process boundaries: a shared proponent or directive usually means a shared purpose. A form cited on the face of another is part of that same transaction, and continuation sheets, covers and transmittals complete it.
Revision follows the process, which is why editions appear without a fixed interval, and the printed date rather than any version number identifies them. Nothing on a stored copy signals that it has aged; the check is manual. Work already completed under a superseded edition stands as filed, because the record was made under those terms and is properly interpreted under them.
One boundary should be stated clearly. What is distributed here are copies of published Department of the Army forms; the site is independent, issues nothing of its own, and holds no position in the system it describes. Proponency, prescribing directives and retention schedules operate without reference to it. Consequently nothing here is legal advice and no assurance about acceptance is possible. Questions about a particular entry, a requirement or eligibility belong with TRADOC or your servicing administrative office.
Questions and answers
- What is DA Form 1713-3?
- DAILY WATER PRODUCTION LOG - 125 GPH LWP
- Which edition is current?
- September 2015
- Who is responsible for this form?
- TRADOC
- In which formats can it be downloaded?