Military Forms Guide

DA Form 1574-1 — REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BY INVESTIGATING OFFICER

report of proceedings by investigating officer

The reason DA Form 1574-1 looks the way it does is that a file has to speak for itself. Officially REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BY INVESTIGATING OFFICER, it serves to report of proceedings by investigating officer, and the record it produces outlasts the people and the circumstances behind it. Edition 04/01/2016, status ACTIVE, is the version published here: 1 page(s), close to 193 fields, each one present because some later reader will need that fact without being able to ask for it.

The form has an author and an occasion, held by different authorities. TJAG owns the content and reshapes it when what is being recorded changes. AR 15-6 governs the event that calls for the form and the route the finished document takes afterwards. Keeping those two apart is what allows a procedure to be amended without the page being rebuilt each time.

Retrieval governs the order of entry. The head of the form takes name, identification number, unit and date, and those values become the handles by which the record is found later — the substantive blocks are never searched on. This is why the spelling must match official records exactly rather than approximately.

Tab order is not a convenience feature; it was fixed when the form was built and generally traces the page, so following it produces the sequence the designer intended and leaves fewer gaps than a mouse. Exclusive option groups clear the previous selection because the record is not permitted to hold two contradictory answers. Single-line fields do not wrap for the same reason the layout is fixed: the printed page has to fall in known positions, so text past the field width is cut at the margin even though the screen still shows it whole. Overflow belongs in remarks or on a continuation, where there is room designed for it. And an inapplicable field is marked rather than skipped, since a blank tells a later reader nothing about whether the question was considered.

The signature is the point at which entries become an assertion someone stands behind, so it follows everything else and its absence leaves a draft. Countersignatures by reviewing, approving or witnessing officials each carry their own weight and are dated at signing, which is how the file preserves the order of responsibility. Seen that way, the familiar errors are not clerical trivia: an unanswered mandatory field, digits transposed in an identification number, day and month reversed, and residue from a reused file each put something false or unresolved into a document that will be relied upon.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

Why several files for one page? Because the form has to be completed in a headquarters and in places without a workstation, and PDF, XFDL covers both. The fillable pdf holds interactive fields that fix each entry in place and remove handwriting from the equation. The printable pdf is the same layout without those fields, meant for a printer and a pen. Neither is a lesser copy of the other; each answers a condition the other cannot.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • Accomplished_By1
  • Accomplished_By2
  • Action_Recommended
  • Appointed_By
  • Approved
  • Corrective_Action1
  • Corrective_Action2
  • Date1
  • Date2
  • Date3
  • Date4
  • Disapproved
  • FIND_APPR1
  • FIND_APPR2
  • FIND_APPR3
  • FIND_APPR4
  • Findings1
  • Form_Rectangle
  • Furnished_To
  • Investigating_Officer
  • NA10
  • NA11
  • NA12
  • NA2

Disposition is prescribed, not chosen. AR 15-6 names the destination, whether that is a specific office, the unit administrative channel or the personal record, and the applicable records schedule governs how long it survives there. Both rules exist to keep the file consistent across offices with different habits. Take your copy before the document leaves, since it will not come back.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

Editions change because the process changes, and the printed edition date is the only marker of which version a page belongs to. A copy saved locally cannot know it has been superseded, so the date on it is compared against the edition in force before reuse. Records already executed under an earlier edition are left alone — a document is read under the terms it was made, and reopening completed files to match a later form would falsify the account.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to TJAG or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 1574-1?
REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BY INVESTIGATING OFFICER
Which edition is current?
04/01/2016
Who is responsible for this form?
TJAG
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. 04-PUB NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGNERS (NOFORN)
  2. 42-ITEM ONLY PRODUCED IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA

Other forms in the series