Military Forms Guide

DA Form 1380 — RECORD OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OF RESERVE DUTY TRAINING

record of individual performance of reserve duty training

A newer edition of this form has been issued (04/01/2025). Download the current edition.

Administrative documents are written for readers who were not present, and DA Form 1380 is no exception. Titled RECORD OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OF RESERVE DUTY TRAINING, it is used to record of individual performance of reserve duty training — a transaction that means little in conversation and a great deal in a file. The published edition here carries the date 04/01/2025 and the status ACTIVE. Its 1 page(s) and roughly 160 fields are sized to what the record must prove years later, which is always more than the moment appears to need. A newer edition exists. This one is retained because the documents completed on it were completed under its terms and are read under them.

The form has an author and an occasion, held by different authorities. G-1 owns the content and reshapes it when what is being recorded changes. AR 140-185 governs the event that calls for the form and the route the finished document takes afterwards. Keeping those two apart is what allows a procedure to be amended without the page being rebuilt each time.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.

A signature is what converts entries into a record, which is why it comes last and why an unsigned form remains a draft however complete it looks. Where a reviewing official, an approving authority or a witness also signs, each adds a distinct attestation, and each dates the day of signing rather than the day of preparation — the dates trace the sequence of responsibility. The recurring defects are worth knowing precisely because they defeat that purpose: an empty mandatory field leaves an obligation unmet, transposed identification digits attach the record to nobody, a date with day and month reversed puts events in the wrong order, and entries left in a reused working copy assert facts nobody intended.

Personal information may not be gathered silently, and the Privacy Act statement is how that obligation is met on paper: it names the collection authority, the purpose, the routine uses and whether disclosure is mandatory. Because it exists to inform a decision, it belongs before the fields it covers rather than after them. A filled copy then holds personal data and is stored and transmitted under the corresponding safeguards.

Download the form

The published formats — PDF, XFDL, DOC — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The doc file serves the stage before all this, when wording is still being settled and a draft moves between desks; its layout reflows because word processors are built for text, not fixed pages. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

Downloads are free and unregistered. The material was published for general use, and the files are passed on unaltered.

What the form asks for

  • APPROP
  • ATA
  • ATADL
  • BRANCH
  • BUTTON1_signature
  • CITE_AUTH
  • ContentArea1
  • ContentArea2
  • DATE
  • DAY
  • DAY_1
  • DAY_10
  • DAY_11
  • DAY_2
  • DAY_3
  • DAY_4
  • DAY_5
  • DAY_6
  • DAY_7
  • DAY_8
  • DAY_9
  • DUTIES
  • DUTIES_1
  • DUTIES_10

The routing in AR 140-185 decides where the document goes — a named office, the administrative channel, or the individual's file — and the records schedule for the series decides how long it stays. Neither is a local judgement, because a record system loses its meaning if each office keeps things for its own preferred interval. Copy the form before submitting it.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

An edition marks the form at a point in a process that keeps moving, and the date printed on the page is what distinguishes one from another. Since a saved file never announces its own obsolescence, compare its date against the current edition before using it again. Prior executions remain valid: the change applies forward, and a record is read against the edition it was written under.

It is worth being plain about what this page is within all of the above. The files are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, offered for download by a site with no official standing and no part in issuing anything. That matters because the machinery described here — proponency, prescribing directives, records schedules — runs entirely elsewhere. Nothing written here is legal advice, and no statement can be made about whether an office will accept a given document. G-1 and the administrative office servicing your unit answer questions of entry, requirement and eligibility, and they are the ones positioned to.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 1380?
RECORD OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OF RESERVE DUTY TRAINING
Which edition is current?
04/01/2025
Who is responsible for this form?
G-1
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, DOC, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

Other forms in the series