Military Forms Guide

DA Form 1208 — REPORT OF CLAIMS OFFICER

report of claims officer

The reason DA Form 1208 looks the way it does is that a file has to speak for itself. Officially REPORT OF CLAIMS OFFICER, it serves to report of claims officer, and the record it produces outlasts the people and the circumstances behind it. Edition 01/01/1955, status ACTIVE, is the version published here: 4 page(s), close to 200 fields, each one present because some later reader will need that fact without being able to ask for it.

The form has an author and an occasion, held by different authorities. TJAG owns the content and reshapes it when what is being recorded changes. PAM 27-162 governs the event that calls for the form and the route the finished document takes afterwards. Keeping those two apart is what allows a procedure to be amended without the page being rebuilt each time.

The heading blocks come first because the record is retrieved by them, not read into. Name as official records spell it, identification number, unit, date of preparation — those four are the index, and everything below them is content that only surfaces once the index has done its work. A form filed under a name written casually is not lost in principle, only in practice, which amounts to the same thing.

Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.

Signing is the act that makes the document evidence, and until it happens the entries are only a proposal. Additional signatures — reviewer, approver, witness — each stand for a separate judgement, dated when applied so the record shows who accepted what and in what order. The common faults all damage that record in the same way: a blank mandatory field breaks the chain of required answers, swapped digits in an identification number detach the document from its subject, an inverted day and month misplaces it in time, and stale data from a reused copy states things nobody meant to state.

Personal information may not be gathered silently, and the Privacy Act statement is how that obligation is met on paper: it names the collection authority, the purpose, the routine uses and whether disclosure is mandatory. Because it exists to inform a decision, it belongs before the fields it covers rather than after them. A filled copy then holds personal data and is stored and transmitted under the corresponding safeguards.

Download the form

The published formats — PDF, XFDL — reflect the range of places a form gets filled in. Where there is a computer, the fillable pdf supplies live fields that keep entries positioned and readable. Where there is not, the printable pdf gives the identical page as flat artwork for pen entry. The distinction is one of setting rather than of authority; the page is the same document in both.

Where a file opens matters more than it appears to. A browser will display a pdf, but browser viewers were built to read documents, and some accept keystrokes into fields they never intended to store — the entries are gone at tab close, without warning, because saving was never part of what that viewer does. A dedicated reader is built around the file's own structure and keeps what you enter. The xfdl file belongs to a different lineage entirely: IBM Lotus Forms, adopted across Army systems for the routing and signature handling built into it. That is why only the Lotus Forms Viewer reads it.

No charge and no account apply: these are published documents, and access to them is not something a distributor is entitled to price.

What the form asks for

  • ACTIN_N
  • ACTIN_Y
  • ADDRESS
  • ADDRESS_1
  • ADDRESS_2
  • ADDRESS_3
  • ADDRESS_4
  • ADDRESS_5
  • AMOUNT_A
  • AMOUNT_A_1
  • AMOUNT_A_2
  • AMOUNT_A_3
  • AMOUNT_A_4
  • AMOUNT_B
  • AMOUNT_B_1
  • AMOUNT_B_2
  • AMOUNT_B_3
  • AMOUNT_B_4
  • AMT_CLA
  • AMT_CLA_1
  • AMT_CLA_2
  • AMT_CLA_3
  • AMT_CLA_4
  • AMT_CLA_5

Where the signed form goes is settled by PAM 27-162 rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

Revision follows the process, which is why editions appear without a fixed interval, and the printed date rather than any version number identifies them. Nothing on a stored copy signals that it has aged; the check is manual. Work already completed under a superseded edition stands as filed, because the record was made under those terms and is properly interpreted under them.

It is worth being plain about what this page is within all of the above. The files are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, offered for download by a site with no official standing and no part in issuing anything. That matters because the machinery described here — proponency, prescribing directives, records schedules — runs entirely elsewhere. Nothing written here is legal advice, and no statement can be made about whether an office will accept a given document. TJAG and the administrative office servicing your unit answer questions of entry, requirement and eligibility, and they are the ones positioned to.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 1208?
REPORT OF CLAIMS OFFICER
Which edition is current?
01/01/1955
Who is responsible for this form?
TJAG
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Publisher notes

  1. 42-ITEM ONLY PRODUCED IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA,

Other forms in the series