Military Forms Guide

DA Form 1119-1 — CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN SAFETY

certificate of achievement in safety

A newer edition of this form has been issued (07/01/1989). Download the current edition.

Administrative documents are written for readers who were not present, and DA Form 1119-1 is no exception. Titled CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN SAFETY, it is used to certificate of achievement in safety — a transaction that means little in conversation and a great deal in a file. The published edition here carries the date 07/01/1989 and the status ACTIVE. Its 1 page(s) and roughly 21 fields are sized to what the record must prove years later, which is always more than the moment appears to need. A newer edition exists. This one is retained because the documents completed on it were completed under its terms and are read under them.

Two offices stand behind the form, and the distinction between them explains most of what follows. CSA is the proponent: it decides what the form asks and revises it when the underlying process changes. not stated is the prescribing authority: it decides when the form is raised at all and where the completed document travels. Content and occasion are separated deliberately, so that a change in procedure does not require redesigning the page.

Identification precedes substance for a structural reason. Name, identification number, organisation and date of preparation are how the finished document is located in a file or a database; the body of the form is what someone reads after the search has succeeded. Spell the name as official records spell it, since the search runs against those records and not against habit.

Much of the form's behaviour follows from its being a fixed page. Tab order was set at build time along the reading sequence, which is why tabbing catches boxes a pointer passes over. Exclusive groups release one choice when another is made because a record cannot carry two answers to a single question. Single-line fields refuse to wrap because every entry must print where the layout expects it — text beyond the width is lost at the margin, visible on screen to the end. That is what remarks areas and continuation sheets are for. Marking a field that does not apply matters for a related reason: emptiness is ambiguous, and a reviewer reading the file later cannot distinguish an omission from a decision.

A signature is what converts entries into a record, which is why it comes last and why an unsigned form remains a draft however complete it looks. Where a reviewing official, an approving authority or a witness also signs, each adds a distinct attestation, and each dates the day of signing rather than the day of preparation — the dates trace the sequence of responsibility. The recurring defects are worth knowing precisely because they defeat that purpose: an empty mandatory field leaves an obligation unmet, transposed identification digits attach the record to nobody, a date with day and month reversed puts events in the wrong order, and entries left in a reused working copy assert facts nobody intended.

The Privacy Act statement is on the page because collecting personal information requires the collector to disclose the terms first — the authority relied on, the purpose, the routine uses, and whether an answer is required or may be withheld. That order is the point: the statement is read before the entries it governs, since consent given afterwards is not consent. Once completed, the copy is a personal record and carries the handling obligations that attach to one.

Download the form

Formats exist because completion happens under different conditions, not because anyone wanted variety. The published set is PDF, XFDL. A fillable pdf carries live entry objects, so typed text lands in fixed positions and stays legible whoever reads it later. A printable pdf drops those objects and leaves the page as an image, which is what an office needs where a screen is unavailable and a pen is not. The document itself is unchanged between them; what differs is the circumstance each anticipates.

Software determines whether an entry lasts. A browser viewer is designed for reading, and several will take typed input into fields without any means of writing it back — the text is simply absent when you reopen. A standalone reader handles the form structure properly. The xfdl file is IBM Lotus Forms, carried in Army systems for the routing and signature support it provides, which is why the Lotus Forms Viewer is its only reader.

There is no charge and no sign-up. Published documents are distributed as published, without modification.

What the form asks for

  • ContentArea1
  • FromDate1
  • Name1
  • Page1
  • PageArea1
  • PrintName1
  • R12
  • R13
  • T10
  • T11
  • T31
  • T43
  • T44
  • TimeAwarded1
  • ToDate1
  • TypeofOperation1
  • creator
  • event__docReady
  • form
  • title
  • version

Where the signed form goes is settled by not stated rather than by the office holding it — a named recipient, the unit administrative channel, or the individual's own file, depending on why it was raised. Retention likewise belongs to the records schedule for the series, which exists so documents are kept for as long as anyone might need them and no longer. Keep a copy before release; the original serves the file from then on, not you.

Related documents are located by series and number, and the relation is rarely accidental — forms under one proponent or one directive tend to serve steps of a single procedure. Anything the DA series form names on its face normally travels with it, as do the continuations, covers and transmittals the process generates. Assembling them together is what makes the submission a complete account.

An edition marks the form at a point in a process that keeps moving, and the date printed on the page is what distinguishes one from another. Since a saved file never announces its own obsolescence, compare its date against the current edition before using it again. Prior executions remain valid: the change applies forward, and a record is read against the edition it was written under.

A word on where this page sits. These are reproductions of published Department of the Army documents, made available by an independent site with no official role and no authority to issue forms. The structure described above — proponent, prescribing directive, records schedule — exists apart from this site entirely, which is why nothing written here is legal advice and why acceptance by any office is not something that can be promised. Put questions of entry, requirement or eligibility to CSA or to the administrative office servicing your unit.

Questions and answers

What is DA Form 1119-1?
CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN SAFETY
Which edition is current?
07/01/1989
Who is responsible for this form?
CSA
In which formats can it be downloaded?
PDF, XFDL, PDF

Other forms in the series